Newsletter

Education & Outreach

Newsletter

13 - Perspectives

The Costs and Benefits of Aggregation Exploitation versus Protection

The enormous appeal of fishing on large groups of temporarily assembled fish is that many can be caught quickly and easily, with important economic and social benefits. Fish spawning aggregations around the world have long formed the basis of seasonal ‘jackpot' fisheries, often involving whole communities, large business interests, or for special occasions.

From an economic perspective, aggregations represent excellent sources of large numbers of fish that can be taken efficiently, a welcome saving of time and operation costs from a commercial or operational perspective, and an attractive opportunity for recreational anglers. They can also be appealing to sports fishers, through dive tourism. Given the benefits and appeal of aggregation-fishing on the one hand, and the longterm problems created by their uncontrolled exploitation on the other, it is timely to add economics to the mix in assessing aggregation-fisheries and objectively compare cost and benefits of protection.

As one example, regular fish gatherings are an obvious target for fishing. However, when commercial pressures come into play, the economics of having gluts of fish in markets resulting in lower value per fish, which often occurs, combined with the negative biological implications of heavy aggregation-fishing (i.e. aggregations losses), make aggregation fishing much less appealing as a long-term good use of natural resources. This situation calls for a closer look at the economics of aggregation versus non-aggregation fishing. The table examines just some of the various costs and benefits of aggregation exploitation versus protection. I would welcome further input to the table.

Economic analyses of the possible costs and benefits of significant aggregation fisheries, and the short- and long-term implications of aggregation protection, can determine the best overall social and economic value of aggregations that is also consistent with good biological management of the target population. Analyses could address fishing volume and value on and off aggregations, with and without aggregation fishing and would need to consider market conditions of supply and demand, fisher responses to management, costs, catchability, profitability, etc. to fully understand the implications of managing aggregations... or not.


Yvonne Sadovy de Mitcheson
SCRFA
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

AGGREGATION FISHING
PERMITTED

Benefits
• Reduced Search Time
• Cost savings on fuel
• Large predictable catches
• May take pressure off other reef resources temporarily
• A ready periodic larder for social/cultural events
• Regular seasonal event for community
activities

Costs
• Market gluts of fish so lower price per fish
• Taking risks in bad weather because competitors are fishing
• People do not need to think about making best economic use of the fishery overall
• Gluts can lead to wastage of unsold fish or those that cannot be stored for long time
periods
• Management to control catch volume
• Inequality of resource access, if some can reach aggregation and some cannot, because overfishing of aggregation can lead to lower catches between aggregations
• Possibility of overfishing resulting in loss of resource in the long term and for all months of the year

AGGREGATION COMPLETELY
PROTECTED FROM FISHING
Benefits
• Biological benefits for the target population
for long term sustainable use
• Higher catches at non-aggregation times and into the long-term
• Protection relatively easy to enforce as limited in time and space
• Possible use for recreational diving benefits

Costs
• Possible increase in pressure on other reef resources temporarily
• Could be expensive to manage an
aggregation and enforce regulation
• Could lead to irregular/low supply of target species at certain times of the year in retail markets
• Could disrupt social or cultural activities

 Expense of monitoring can be costly, and is needed for both options